Local contest-log screening for automation-like operating patterns.
Rows are review signals, not final adjudication. Methodology is available below.
Reference & validation corpus
Historical log/QSO footprint behind BotScan
CW · RTTY · SSB
LOGS
—
logs analyzed
QSOs
—
QSOs processed
DATASETS
—
contest/year datasets
PROFILES
—
contest/mode profiles
Global coverage counts include the separately validated WW DIGI public-log dataset. Its FT8/FT4 model remains independent and does not affect CW/RTTY/SSB calibration or verdict logic.
Peer comparison is category-aware: contest, year, mode, power, band and assistance are used where available. Automation Evidence is independent from claimed rank. Logger/CREATED-BY clustering is context only and never adds score by itself.
Detailed public results are available for selected major contest/year datasets from 2020 onward. Older historical scans may be shown as summary-only context. Batch scans run through the protected review workflow.
Waiting for public library…
1. Choose contest
Choose a contest family to select mode and year.
Waiting for public library…
Historical Results Audit
Validated RED-only Single-Op cases cross-referenced with official CQ and ARRL final results, 2020–2025.
Important:A RED row identifies strong automation-like behavioral anomalies. It is not, by itself, proof of autonomous operation or a rules violation. Official results are shown as a separate competitive reference.
Waiting for historical audit data…
Batch scan results
Contest / year / category
Waiting for logs…
Waiting for logs…
Sorted by Automation Evidence first, then Review Priority, claimed rank and score.
Click a row to open the full review. Default view shows review-relevant cases. Rank is claimed/pre-adjudication and is computed from CLAIMED-SCORE inside each loaded category group. JSON is kept as the technical/dev evidence export; CSV/PDF are for easier human review.
CW / RTTY / SSB Model
2File integrity
3Rule Compliance
3Automation-like pattern markers
4Full peer-group comparison
5Detailed operating statistics
6WW DIGI Deep Review
Optional second-stage review for WW DIGI. Add the original ADIF, complete WSJT-X/JTDX native RX/TX/decode logs from every software instance, and RBN captures when available. These files are parsed in the browser and are not sent to the BotScan analysis API.
Evidence is cumulative: load ADIF, native logs and RBN data in any order. ZIP remains available for mixed evidence. Minute-only RBN timestamps are never used to infer simultaneous TX.
No Deep Review evidence loaded.
Historical audit detail
BotScan evidence and official competitive results are shown separately.
Methodology
Cabrillo contest-log review methodology.
BotScan is a first-stage analytical detector. It highlights logs that deserve deeper review; it does not replace committee judgment.
1. Input and eligibility
BotScan reads selected Cabrillo logs in the protected interface and processes them through the controlled review workflow. The core parses Cabrillo headers and QSO lines, removes exact repeated QSO-line artifacts from behavioral metrics, and separates non-scored records. Standard contest review remains Single-Op; WW DIGI is the specific exception where Multi-Op logs may also be analyzed for category/compliance context, with deliberately limited bot inference.
2. Metrics
The analysis combines file integrity, rest breaks, continuous operating blocks, frequency-change rate, run/S&P texture, minute-level frequency spread, band movement, rate context, duplicate/reworked-station context and frequency-detail quality. Each metric is interpreted by mode and contest profile, not as a single global rule.
3. Peer comparison
Each established contest and category has its own historical peer profile. BotScan compares the uploaded log against matching Single-Op groups by contest, year, mode, power, band and assistance where available. WW DIGI is handled separately with category-aware rules and published historical rate references while its full public-log baseline is being expanded, so digital operation is not forced through CW/RTTY/SSB frequency-movement rules.
4. Evidence logic
BotScan avoids relying on one weak signal. RED-level review requires hard timing, scanner/no-run structure, hard minute-level spread, or multiple independent evidence families. In RTTY Single-Op review, 5+ distinct logged frequencies in one minute remains a high-priority hard spread signal. Frequency-spread display now starts at 4+ and dynamically reveals higher 7+/8+ levels only when they are present. Three-frequency minutes are retained only as internal/informational context. In CW, isolated single-band 5-frequency minutes are treated as aggressive S&P context; repeated 5+ or any 6+ minute remains high-priority review. In SSB, stable dual-run/2BSIQ and aggressive S&P are handled separately, and SSB scatter is compared against the matching historical peer-group peer reference/max before it affects review level. Fast duplicates and same-band reworked stations remain context only and do not create RED by themselves. For WW DIGI, legal SO2R/2BSIQ is explicitly protected: SINGLE-ONE and MULTI-ONE are limited by transmitted signals, not by radios in use. Exactly two bands inside one Cabrillo minute is normal operating context; repeated 3+ band minutes are rare screening texture, never proof of simultaneous TX.
5. Batch ranking context
In batch mode, claimed score is used only to show pre-adjudication rank inside the loaded category group. Automation Evidence is calculated separately from claimed rank.
6. Limitations
Cabrillo timestamps are usually minute-level, so the tool is a screening layer. This limitation is especially important in WW DIGI: logged frequency is treated as dial/subband information, not as the individual FT4/FT8 audio DF/offset. Cabrillo cannot reveal the operator action that initiated a QSO, exact TX-slot overlap, decode-source provenance or receiver location. Historical rate statistics are outlier context, not proof thresholds. Strong WW DIGI flags should be followed with the original ADIF, complete native RX/TX/decode logs from every software instance, and FT4/FT8 RBN correlation where available.
7. Historical Results Audit
The historical audit includes RED-only Single-Op cases and cross-references them with official CQ and ARRL final results. BotScan evidence, official rank, disqualification status and record references remain separate data layers. A RED row is not, by itself, proof of autonomous operation or a rules violation.