BotScan v0.13.11

Local contest-log screening for automation-like operating patterns. Rows are review signals, not final adjudication. Methodology and version notes are available below.

Peer reference corpus
Historical Single-Op contest-log reference base
CW · RTTY · SSB
LOGS
processed reference logs
QSOs
processed reference QSOs
GROUPS
contest/category peer groups
CONTESTS
14
contests covered
Embedded Single-Op reference corpus covering major and regional contest profiles. BotScan is one unified local tool: it detects contest, mode and category from each uploaded log, then applies the matching CW, RTTY or SSB review logic. The log/QSO top-card footprint is kept conservative to avoid double-counting overlapping calibration families.
Contests covered
ARRL-DX-CWARRL-DX-SSBCQ-160-CWCQ-WPX-CWCQ-WPX-RTTYCQ-WPX-SSBCQ-WW-CWCQ-WW-RTTYCQ-WW-SSBEA-RTTYIARU-HFOK-OM-DX-CWWAE-CWWAE-RTTY
Single-Op peer groups CW / RTTY / SSB coverage No private log uploads Local browser processing Minute-level Cabrillo timestamps
Peer comparison is category-aware: contest, year, mode, power, band and assistance are used where available. Automation Evidence is independent from claimed rank. Logger/CREATED-BY clustering is context only and never adds score by itself.

1Drop a Cabrillo log to analyze

📄
Drop a Cabrillo log here, or click to select
Accepts .log, .cbr, .txt — single-op logs only
Public Results Library
Load processed BotScan batch results from logs.lu9esd.com/results. Original public Cabrillo logs stay in R2; this page reads the generated JSON results.
Waiting for public library…
1. Choose contest
Choose a contest family to select mode and year.
Waiting for public library…
Batch scan results
Contest / year / category
Waiting for logs…
Waiting for logs…
Sorted by Automation Evidence first, then Review Priority, claimed rank and score.
Click a row to open the full review. Default view shows review-relevant cases. Rank is claimed/pre-adjudication and is computed from CLAIMED-SCORE inside each loaded category group. JSON is kept as the technical/dev evidence export; CSV/PDF are for easier human review.

2File integrity

3Automation-like pattern markers

4Full peer-group comparison

5Detailed operating statistics